The following is from The Red Alert, the monthly Newsletter from PAC.
NOTE: The following article is based on international law (i.e. Law of Nations).
The important thing to understand when you read the following is- The United States Constitution is an international agreement between the state/nations of America i.e. the union of American nations i.e. the Union- “The United States of America”.
In volume 114 of The Red Alert (the July 2001 issue) I covered the distinction between a resident and an inhabitant. For those who had an occasion to read such article in mention hopefully came away with the understanding that such terms are fundamentally deemed as being the same.
In review, both terms basically define a person that is from another jurisdiction (or country) that is living in political area (permanently or temporally) that is foreign to his natural or acquired nationality; hence, has no absolute nexus to such territory. Hence, all land that is owned by a man in such an “area” is that of a commercial or privileged ownership. [1] Accordingly, people that are claiming to be U.S. citizens are actually a resident or an inhabitant of the country of which they are living in, such being the alternate political jurisdiction created by the 14th amendment, thus are deemed to be living “within the State” (or within this State), which is- in the State de facto. Therefore, all land is that of a feudal tenure [2] of sorts, and is titled in the de facto system (i.e. registered with the State de facto), rather than being that of an absolute titled possession. Such property is thus taxed for the benefit of all in the Marxist system that is fashioned by the 14th amendment political system. Moreover, in the close of “Inhabitant vs. Resident” I mentioned that the so-called public lands that are found in the states in the Union is in an adverse possession. All such land has been acquired by the United States, by the tacit approval of U.S. citizens (i.e. the 14th amendment system). What this really involves is the absolute right to land within one’s country as compared to the acquisition of such land for the benefit of a foreign faction or nations, which is the case of the current arrangement— the United States has unlawful possession. [3]
In view of these matters, we have several things to consider; however, there is one factor of which I find the most important, and stated in simple terms is- When a child, or a man, tells a lie he generally has to tell more lies to cover-up the original one or the original lie will be found out. Now, in the same sense- The fourteenth amendment system creates a lie; accordingly, more lies have to be executed to cover-up the original lie. But, you must understand that this lie has been devised since the drafting of the original Constitution. Such lie is that the “State of the Union” is a national government. This “legal premise” or “aspiration” was first discussed in the Federalist Papers: Essays by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay outlining the Constitution for the United States of America. Accordingly, I believe that these people were instrumental in sculpting the New World Order (which is actually world communism) under the United States. As I have not investigated, with the exception of Hamilton, it is hard to say if such people were agents of a faction that has not been fully disclosed; however, one could venture that the same faction that supported such men can be found intertwined with the ones that are element of the G-8, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers, and others.
Such matters nonetheless, the element in query here is that central control of people is needed for industrial or commercial gain and profit, thus people need to be brought under the control of one source to be programmed toward such gain and profit. That source is the United States. Such establishment was originally sold as being necessary to “Form a more perfect Union”. To form such a [u]nion, the premise was established in the Federalist Papers that the State of the Union was, again, a federal and a national government. As I stated this is a premise (or pipe dream) of a bunch of frauds- in other words- such premise is not at all the truth or one that holds any legal validity. Remembering that the term “congress” is a term of international law, the plain fact is- Either the [U]nited States of America is many nations that form a federation and work through international compacts (i.e. contractual agreements) via the United States, which would make the United States strictly act as a federation government, or that the United States is not a federation government and is strictly a national government. [4] For these reasons stated, there is no “middle-ground” in this matter. People that buy into the lie or fraud that the United States is a national and federal government will not win their legal battles, especially in the de facto system.
Accordingly, as I stated, once a lie is committed to- more lies have to be made to cover-up the original lie. The legal term of which has been established to cover-up the big lie is termed: Conflict of Laws. Such is legally defined in Black’s Law Dictionary, sixth edition, as follows:
· Conflict of Laws. Inconsistency or difference between the laws of different states or countries, arising in the case of persons who have acquired rights, incurred obligations, injuries or damages, or made contracts, within the territory of two or more jurisdictions. Hence, that branch of jurisprudence, arising from the diversity of the laws of different nations, states or jurisdictions, in their application to rights and remedies, which reconciles the inconsistency, or decides which law or system is to govern the particular case, or settles the degree of force to be accorded to the law of another jurisdiction (the acts or rights in question having arising under it), either where it varies from the domestic law, or where the domestic law is silent or not exclusively applicable to the case in point.
And therefore—
· Private International Law. A name used by some writers to indicate that branch of the law which is now more commonly called “Conflict of Laws” (q.v. above).
So, what we have is law that asserts private wants or needs of people; or, in the case of the 14th amendment system- Forces. The most blatant example is the suffrage that is instituted under said system (see the 15th, 19th and 26th amendments, forced private international law i.e. totalitarianism). Before this, each nation in the Union could determine who was to participate in their “domestic” (state) elections i.e. a “state” right. Such rights have been negated by the system that has been installed by the fourteenth amendment. The people that are participating are the ones that tricked to be, and are deemed to be, in treason to the state (or their country).
This “stair-step effect” is how the United States is making Americans subject to the United Nations under treaty, all such matters being “Private International Law”. Again, the ones that are in treason to their law form de jure (i.e. law of right) are the ones that are “subject” to all such mentioned private law that is instituted by the United States. The separation between “nationals de jure” and “nationals of the United States” is dependent on one’s status, which is determined on how people act (i.e. the way one contracts with his state of domicile and the United States). [5] A “national de jure” does not receive or entertain any rights, privileges or immunities from the federal government or the several States de facto; all such matters which are grounded in private law and/or private international law, as purviews through the United States. In contraposition, the rights of a national are bequeathed by God, which is then conjoined into the “common law” of a nation i.e. its customs and usages. Accordingly, in this sense, the “United States” is actually working in a quasi-dual capacity, where in fact, there are several nations that are created, which are: 1) The communist nation under the control of the United States and its political subdivisions, which are the several States de facto (Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(22)(A)); and, 2) The sundry state nations of the Union (of which each have their own nationalities, Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(21)).
Therefore, not being in error, I must somewhat retract that the “United States” acts as both a federation and a national government. Even though it was designed since day-one, which can be established by the content of the original Constitution, after the induction of the 14th amendment, the United States does act in bifurcation. For U.S. citizens and nationals it is acting as a national government, with the several States de facto acting as its quasi-political subdivisions (its counties of sorts). [6] Through the operations that are set forth through the fourteenth amendment, the people that are electing the state and federal officers have installed these governments, thus are subject to their “private” law; and all such people that are electing such bodies thus being in rebellion to their state of right. However, note the stealthy catch to this formula is: The state (and federal) governments must uphold any law de jure, which is primarily grounded in each state constitution of the Union, or they will be in sedition (really treason) to the state (or the nationals of any such state/country). [7]
So in conclusion: There is not a so-called dual nationality in America; the theory of such has been established so that the scheme can be covered-up. Ergo: One is either a national of a state or a national of the United States. It depends what “side of the fence” you are on; and, one cannot have one foot planted on each side of the proverbial fence. These determining factors can only be determined on ones actions, which includes an express statement as to all such matters.
In view of all such matters of law, of which have been stressed herein, “citizens of the United States” are also “nationals of the United States”, hence, please bear in mind- “The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.” [8]
So— What is your nationality, and what is the name of your country? If you answered that your nationality is American and that the United States of America is your country—
Congratulations, you have been well conditioned. . .
You are a Communist !
· “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax”
Plank 2- Communist Manifesto, 1848
· “The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.”
Communist Manifesto, 1848
· in·cog·ni·zant. Lacking knowledge or awareness; unaware: incognizant of the new political situation.
Word for Word from the American Heritage Dictionary, 1998
Hey, have a nice red “E Pluribus Unum” day! (E Pluribus Unum = many under one)
People’s Awareness Coalition constitutional education and counsel
POB # 313
Kieler, Wisconsin [53812]
www.pacinlaw.org
[1] In example- Title 42 § 1981 of the United States Code, which is derived from acts passed during the so-called Civil War, provided rights to the people of African ancestry; however, it is not an absolute right under the law of nations but rather a privilege that is enforced within the States; 42 § 1981 is as follows- Equal rights under the law. (a) Statement of equal rights. All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
[2] feudalism, n. Abbr. feud. 1. A political and economic system of Europe from the 9th to about the 15th century, based on the holding of all land in fief or fee and the resulting relation of lord to vassal and characterized by homage, legal and military service of tenants, and forfeiture. 2. A political, economic, or social order resembling this medieval system. --feu“dal·ist n. --feu”dal·is“tic adj. (American Heritage Dictionary)
[3] However, one must investigate each states “enabling act” to see what concessions were made to any such state when Congress granted each state its statehood (such only applying to the ones after the Union was formed; any other land is considered an adverse possession based on the 14th amendment political system).
[4] As a state is a nation in international law (hence each American state is a nation), the following is typical gibberish established by Black’s Law (a publication of the Crown of England) to cover-up the truth and confuse lawyers and attorneys- National government. The government of a whole nation, as distinguished from that of a state, local or territorial division of the nation, and also as distinguished from that of a league or confederation. Commonly referred to as the federal government. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th. Note that such infers that the government of a confederation is commonly referred to as the federal government: Ergo- If you are not deemed a “national of the U.S.” i.e. U.S. citizen, the United States is accurately termed a federation government, not a national government.
[5] Moreover, it is important to understand that: In our constitutional federation, generally, there is no word or term of law that means one thing; it depends in the jurisdiction and context any such word or term is implemented.
[6] This has been termed “Cooperative Federalism”, which is a fancy or cover-up term for Communism.
[7] Which is set forth by an operation of law that is set forth by section 3 of the fourteenth amendment.
[8] Such is dogma that is found in the “Communist Manifesto” of 1848.